Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Peer Review Models

Further Reading

Sandra P. Thomas (Editor) (2018) Current Controversies Regarding Peer Review in Scholarly Journals, Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 39:2, 99-101,

Csiszar, A. (2016) Peer review: Troubled from the start. Nature 532:306-8.

Ferguson, C., Marcus, A., & Oransky, I. (2014). Publishing: The peer-review scamNature News515(7528), 480. 

Spier, R. (2002) The history of the peer-review process. Trends in Biotechnology 20(8):357-8.