Skip to Main Content

LAW 73372 — Federalism Seminar (A.J. Bellia): Historic Case Filings

This is the one on which I am working.

Historic Case Filings

 

Bloomberg, Lexis and Westlaw are great resources, but they typically only include case filings from the late 1990s - present day.

 

The following databases provide access to historic briefs, motions and pleadings for both U.S. Courts of Appeals and Supreme Court Cases.

 

For assistance, please contact the research librarians at the Kresge Law Library by email: AskUs@nd.edu.

Supreme Court

The Making of Modern Law: U.S. Supreme Court Records and Briefs (1832–1978) 

contains the world's most comprehensive online collection of records and briefs brought before the nation's highest court by leading legal practitioners—many who later became judges and associates of the Supreme Court itself. It includes transcripts, applications for review, motions, petitions, supplements, and other official papers of the most-studied and talked-about cases, including many that resulted in landmark decisions. This collection serves the needs of students and researchers in American legal history, politics, society, and government, as well as practicing attorneys.

This collection is especially strong on such topics as:

  • interpretations of the Constitution and its amendments,
  • judicial review and the role of the courts in American history,
  • states' rights and national sovereignty,
  • discrimination and modern civil liberties,
  • intellectual property and technology, and the
  • evolving nature of race, gender, faith, and identity.

 

ProQuest Supreme Court Insight (1993-2016)

is an online collection of full opinions from Supreme Court argued cases, including per curiam decisions. Includes dockets, petitions for writ of certiorari, petitioner and respondent briefs, joint appendices and amicus briefs. Transcripts of oral arguments dating back to 1955 are also included. 

Heard case collections, including in forma pauperis cases, date from 1933-2016.

Content associated with each case is compiled on a dynamic page organized to facilitate understanding of the judicial process, and is also retrievable on a document by document basis.  Supreme Court Insight offers links from case-specific records to Legislative Insight and Regulatory Insight as well.

Certiorari Denied content, from 1975-2017, is fully integrated with Supreme Court Insight. This collection includes dockets, petitions for writ of certiorari, and all petition stage briefs, including amicus briefs. 

U.S. Courts of Appeals

The Making of Modern Law: Landmark Records and Briefs of the U.S. Courts of Appeals (1891-1980)

focuses on the first ninety years of the federal appellate court system's history, drawing together a remarkable collection of legal primary source documents long unavailable to researchers. This collection chronicles the evolution of the appellate courts, deepening our understanding of social, economic, political, and historical issues from 1891 until the start of the Reagan era in 1980. This collection makes searchable nearly two million pages of briefs from appellants, appellees, and supporters (through amicus briefs). It also includes appellant and appellee replies, appendices, memoranda, petitions, statements, transcripts, and more.

The records collected here are often unique and notoriously difficult to access. They easily elude scholars since court records and briefs are not “published” in any traditional sense but are produced in relatively small quantities, usually fewer than fifty copies.

From the hundreds of thousands of cases that were considered for inclusion, The Making of Modern Law: Landmark Records and Briefs of the U.S. Courts of Appeals selects those from the circuit courts that remain among the most heavily cited in the legal literature.

 

For assistance, please contact the research librarians at the Kresge Law Library by email: AskUs@nd.edu.

Kresge Law Library Footer

Historic Case Filings

The transcript from Hammer v. Dagenhart 247 U.S. 251 (1917).

 

 

The appellant's brief from Baker v. Carr 369 U.S. 186 (1962).